Cache poisoning is a cyber attack technique that targets the temporary storage areas, known as caches, used by computers and networks to speed up access to data and websites.
These caches can be found in various parts of the internet infrastructure, including web browsers, DNS servers, and content delivery networks (CDNs).
It manipulates or "poisons" the information stored in these caches, attackers can redirect users to malicious websites, spread malware, or steal sensitive information.
What is Cache Poisoning?
Cache poisoning is about introducing false or malicious data into a cache so that this corrupted data is served to users instead of the legitimate information. This can lead to a variety of harmful outcomes, depending on the cache targeted.
For example, if a web browser's cache is poisoned, a user might be directed to a fake version of a legitimate website.
Cache poisoning attacks exploit the trust that systems place in cached data, using this trust to spread misinformation or malicious content quickly and efficiently. Since caches often serve many users, a single successful poisoning event can affect a large number of people or systems.
{{cool-component}}
How Caches Actually Work
A cache stores previously fetched responses so future requests can be served faster. Caches sit at several layers, including the browser, a shared proxy, a CDN edge, and sometimes the application server itself.
- Cache keys. A cache key identifies a stored response. Good keys include the HTTP method, host, path, query string, and any headers or cookies that change the response. The Vary header tells shared caches which request headers must be part of the key.
- Freshness and TTL. The Cache-Control and Expires headers define how long a response stays fresh. Examples include max-age, s-maxage for shared caches, and stale-while-revalidate for soft extension while the cache rechecks with origin.
- Validation. When freshness ends, caches can revalidate instead of refetching completely. Origins use validators like ETag and Last-Modified. Clients send If-None-Match or If-Modified-Since to confirm whether the stored copy is still correct.
- Private vs shared. Cache-Control: private allows browser caching but not shared caches. public permits shared caching. no-cache means revalidate before reuse. no-store means do not write to any cache.
- Negative and redirect caching. Many caches store errors and redirects. A cached 301 or a long‑lived 404 can amplify mistakes across users if the TTL is generous.
- Normalization. Caches sometimes normalize URLs, reorder query parameters, trim trailing slashes, or compress headers. If normalization does not match application logic, a response influenced by unkeyed input can be stored and reused across different requests. That is a common entry point for web cache poisoning.
- Personalization boundaries. Pages that vary by authentication, locale, or A/B bucket should either not be cached in shared layers or must include all varying dimensions in the key. Remove Set-Cookie from cacheable paths, and avoid reflecting untrusted input in cacheable responses.
- Client storage. Browsers keep asset caches and may also use a service worker cache. Treat service worker scopes as part of your caching model, and ensure update strategies evict stale or corrupted assets.
When a cache serves the wrong response because the key ignored a response‑shaping input, an attacker may craft a single request that poisons the stored entry for everyone who follows. That is the essence of web cache poisoning.
Types of Cache Poisoning
Cache poisoning attacks can be categorized based on the target they focus on, such as web browser caches, DNS servers, or Content Delivery Networks (CDNs). Each type has its unique method of execution and potential impact.
1. Web Browser Cache Poisoning
This form of attack targets the cache within users' web browsers. Attackers manipulate the stored data that a browser saves to quicken the loading times of previously visited websites.
It inserts malicious content or redirects links in the cache, which can lead users to harmful websites or phishing pages, all the while the user believes they are accessing a safe and familiar site.
2. DNS Cache Poisoning
Also known as DNS spoofing, this attack involves corrupting the cache of a DNS server. The DNS, or Domain Name System, translates website names into IP addresses that computers can understand.
In a poisoning attack, the attacker alters the cache to redirect users from a legitimate site to a fraudulent one, despite typing the correct address.
This type of attack can have widespread effects because it can redirect a large volume of traffic to malicious sites.
3. CDN Cache Poisoning
CDNs are used to distribute website content efficiently from servers located around the world. By poisoning a CDN's cache, an attacker can spread malicious content across multiple sites and users.
This is a major CDN security risk and is usually performed by tricking the CDN into caching a malicious version of a webpage and then serving that version to users, leading to widespread dissemination of malware or fraudulent content.
4. DNS Client Cache Poisoning
This variation targets the DNS cache stored locally on a user's computer or device. When it corrupts this local cache, attackers can control where the user is directed when entering specific website addresses, leading to similar risks as DNS server cache poisoning but on a more targeted scale.
Goes without saying, but this is extremely harmful, since it allows for more refined control, resulting in leakage of more mission-critical data.
Implications of Cache Poisoning Attacks
Cache poisoning attacks affect the integrity of data, user trust, and the overall security sphere. However, it wouldn’t have been such a pain to resolve if its implications were limited to mere data manipulation.
Here’s what an attacker can accomplish via cache poisoning:
1. Launch of Security Breaches and Data Theft
Cache poisoning sets the stage for attackers to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. They can redirect users to fake websites, tricking them into divulging personal details, login credentials, and financial information.
This not only breaches individual privacy but can also lead to significant financial losses and tarnish the reputation of affected organizations.
2. Widespread Distribution of Malware
You’re looking at manipulated cache entries, which means the attacker can force users onto sites loaded with malware.
Unsuspecting users may download harmful software that could lead to data theft, ransomware attacks, and further proliferation of the malware across networks.
3. Undermining User Confidence
When users are redirected from trusted sites to malicious ones, it shakes their confidence in the safety of the internet. As a user, it’ll be hard to trust a business once it has made this slip-up.
It’s not only limited to the target business but can have holistic implications. This erosion of trust can have long-lasting effects, making users wary of online transactions and sharing personal data, ultimately impacting businesses and service providers.
4. Disruption to Online Services
The stability and availability of online services can be severely impacted by cache poisoning.
For industries reliant on the internet, such as e-commerce, banking, and digital content delivery, this disruption can translate into considerable downtime and financial losses.
5. Escalation of Operational Costs
The aftermath of a cache poisoning attack can be expensive and resource-intensive to rectify. Organizations might need to:
- Conduct thorough investigations
- Beef up their security protocols
- Manage public relations efforts
- Go through the legal ramifications of breaches
All of this contributes to increased operational costs.
Defending Against Cache Poisoning
A good defense always starts with the most vulnerable areas, which in this case are the locations where a Cache pool is being formed.
Below is a combination of techniques you can use to ensure these locations are best protected:
Conclusion
In essence, cache poisoning, while being a major threat is not the end of the world. It’s always recommended to have a fortified defense and response against cache attacks, because once hit, they can cause lasting damage to your business. Protecting the integrity of the internet and the security of its users is not just a technical challenge but a critical responsibility for everyone involved in the digital ecosystem.
FAQs
What are the fundamental differences between web cache poisoning and DNS cache poisoning?
Web cache poisoning targets HTTP caching layers and abuses unkeyed input or misconfiguration so cached responses carry attacker content. DNS cache poisoning targets resolvers and name servers, often through DNS pollution, so clients resolve a domain to an attacker IP. One corrupts content delivery, the other corrupts name resolution.
How can attackers manipulate cache entries to serve malicious content to users?
They search for inputs that affect responses but are not included in the cache key. Examples include special headers, ambiguous query parameters, and content type quirks. If the cache stores that altered response, later visitors get it from the edge. Some attacks also poison error pages and redirects.
What techniques can help prevent DNS pollution from causing cache poisoning?
Harden resolvers with source port and transaction ID randomization, QNAME minimization, 0x20 case randomization, and strict bailiwick checking. Deploy DNSSEC for signed zones and validate signatures. Monitor for TTL anomalies and unexpected authorities. These steps make it much harder to poison DNS cache entries at scale.
Are there effective mitigation strategies besides cache invalidation?
Yes. Design complete cache keys, restrict which headers can influence caching, and disable shared caching for dynamic or personalized routes. Set conservative TTLs on risky paths, remove Set-Cookie from cacheable responses, and add WAF or proxy rules that normalize or drop suspect inputs before they reach origin.
How often should cache configurations be reviewed to avoid cache poisoning vulnerabilities?
Review rules at every major release that changes routing or headers, then run a focused review at least quarterly. Add continuous tests that fuzz headers and parameters on cacheable routes. Track cache hit ratios and unusual redirect spikes. Treat caches as code, with version control, peer review, and rollbacks.
